Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 43(2)abr. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1450017

ABSTRACT

Nuestro objetivo es determinar si el tratamiento para Helicobacter pylori (HP) con doxiciclina, furazolidona, bismuto y un inhibidor de bomba de protones mantiene su efectividad en nuestra población. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, no aleatorio, realizado en una clínica privada de Lima, Perú. Se obtuvo la información de la historia clínica digital. Se incluyó a pacientes con el diagnóstico de infección por HP por biopsia y/o test rápido de la ureasa, obtenidos al realizar una endoscopía entre enero 2017 a octubre 2022. Debían haber recibido el tratamiento cuádruple en estudio o un esquema triple alternativo con amoxicilina, levofloxacino e inhibidor de bomba de protones y tener una prueba de aliento para HP en el lapso de 1 a 6 meses después del tratamiento. El esquema cuádruple con furazolidona logró la erradicación en 117/122 casos (95,9%) mientras que el triple con levofloxacino en 5/16 (31,2%) cuando se usó por 7 dias y en 22/38 (57,9%) cuando se usó por 10 días, siendo las diferencias altamente significativas (p>0,001). En conclusión, el tratamiento cuádruple con furazolidona mostró alta efectividad, mientras que el triple con levofloxacino no alcanzó niveles aceptables.


Our objective is to determine the effectiveness of a therapeutic regimen for helicobacter pylori that includes a proton pump inhibitor, doxycycline, furazolidone and bismuth in our location. We carried out a retrospective study, non-randomized, in a private hospital in Lima, Peru. Patients with biopsy and/or rapid urease test proven helicobacter pylori infection after an endoscopy, from January 2017 to October 2022 were included. They received the therapeutic regimen of the study or an alternative triple regimen with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and levofloxacin and were followed with a urea breath test within 1 to 6 months upon completion of therapy. The quadruple therapy with furazolidone obtained success in 117/122 cases (95.9%) while the triple therapy with levofloxacin only in 5/16 (31.2%) when used for 7 days and 22/38 (57.9%) when used for 10 days, a statistically significant difference with p<0.001. Conclusion: Quadruple therapy with furazolidone reached high effectiveness in our location, while triple therapy with levofloxacin was not an acceptable alternative.

2.
Acta méd. costarric ; 65(1): 21-25, ene.-mar. 2023. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, SaludCR | ID: biblio-1527609

ABSTRACT

Resumen Objetivo: Este estudio tiene como objetivo principal determinar la respuesta al esquema de tratamiento de primera línea con triple terapia estándar (amoxicilina, claritromicina, omeprazol), para erradicación de Helicobacter pylori en una determinada población, para determinar si este esquema propuesto en guías internacionales es aún una opción adecuada para pacientes en una determinada región de Costa Rica. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda en el servicio de gastroenterología del Hospital San Francisco de Asís, Grecia, Alajuela, Costa Rica; de todos los pacientes con infección por Helicobacter pylori y que recibieron tratamiento de primera línea con triple terapia (amoxicilina, claritromicina y omeprazol) por 14 días, en el periodo comprendido entre febrero 2017 a febrero 2019, incluyendo para el análisis solamente en los que se contaba con una prueba confirmatoria posterior a tratamiento, ya fuera por antígeno fecal de H. pylori o biopsia convencional. Resultados: Se identificaron un total de 369 casos. El diagnóstico se realizó con biopsia en el 96,4% de los pacientes. La respuesta al tratamiento de primera línea se alcanzó en un 90.5% corroborada por antígeno fecal en el 92.1% de los casos. Conclusiones: Este estudio muestra que la terapia triple con amoxicilina, claritromicina e Inhibidor de bomba de protones por 14 días mantiene un adecuado nivel de eficacia. Sin embargo, hay que tomar en cuenta que estos datos son únicamente de un área de atracción determinada y puede que no reflejen la realidad de todo el país.


Abstract Aim: The main objective of this study is to determine the response to the firstline treatment regimen with triple standard therapy (amoxicillin, clarithromycin, omeprazole), to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in a certain population. The goal is to determine if the proposed regimen in international guidelines services is still a suitable option for patients in a certain region of Costa Rica. Methods: The study took place in San Francisco de Asís Hospital, Grecia, Alajuela, Costa Rica. All patients with a Helicobacter pylori infection that were given first- line treatment with triple therapy (amoxicillin, clarithromycin and omeprazole) for its eradication for 14 days, in the period between February of 2017 and February of 2019, were included in the study. Results: A total of 369 cases were identified. The diagnosis was made with biopsy in 96.4% of patients. Response to first-line treatment was achieved in 90.5% corroborated by fecal antigen in 92.1% of all cases. Conclusions: This study shows that triple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin and omeprazole for 14 days maintains an adequate level of efficacy. However, it must be considered that these results are from a specific area and may not reflect the reality of the entire country.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Costa Rica , Drug Resistance, Bacterial
3.
Biomédica (Bogotá) ; 42(2): 264-277, ene.-jun. 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1403580

ABSTRACT

Introducción. A mediados de la década de 1950, el país adoptó e implementó la Campaña de Erradicación de la Malaria (CEM), sin que hasta ahora se haya hecho su evaluación. Objetivo. Evaluar los resultados alcanzados en las fases de ataque y consolidación de la campaña de erradicación de la malaria en Colombia, entre 1959 y 1979. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo de los resultados "malariométricos" y operacionales de la CEM en Colombia entre 1959 y 1979 a partir de los datos recopilados de los archivos del Ministerio de Salud Pública. Se utilizaron los criterios establecidos por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) relacionados con las fases de un programa de erradicación de malaria. Se almacenó, tabuló y analizó la información, y se elaboraron y aplicaron indicadores malariométricos. Resultados. En el periodo de erradicación a corto plazo (1959-1969), durante el primer año de la fase de ataque (1959), se alcanzó una reducción de la transmisión del 94 % (4.172) y, en el último año (1962), una disminución del 88 % (8.426) en la carga acumulada de casos comparada con el promedio anual de la década del 50 (71.031); estos bajos niveles de transmisión se mantuvieron hasta finales de 1969. En el periodo de intensificación del control para la erradicación (1970-1979), se produjo un incremento de la endemia y resurgió la transmisión epidémica. Debido a problemas financieros que afectaron la regularidad de la operación para mantener los resultados, y no habiéndose logrado la interrupción de la transmisión, se observó un resurgimiento de casos en las fases de ataque y consolidación. Conclusiones. La campaña no logró la meta de interrupción de la transmisión de la malaria en el territorio nacional, pero sí se consiguió un acentuado control en áreas de mediana y baja intensidad.


Introduction: In the mid-fifties, Colombia adopted and implemented the Malaria Eradication Campaign (MEC), which has not been evaluated yet in the country. Objective: To evaluate the results achieved during the attack and consolidation phases of the MEC regarding malaria transmission in Colombia between 1959 and 1979. Materials and methods: We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study based on the malariometric and operational results of the MEC in Colombia from 1959 to 1979 compiled from the archives of the Ministry of Public Health. We used the criteria defined by the WHO Expert Committee on Malaria. The information was stored, tabulated, and analyzed based on the malariometric indicators we developed. Results: In the short-term eradication period (1959-1969), a reduction of 94% (4,172) in transmission was achieved during the first year of the attack phase (1959) while in the last year (1962), there was an 88% (8,426) reduction of the accumulated load of cases compared to the annual average of the 1950s (71,031). These low levels of transmission were maintained until the end of 1969. During the intensification period of control of the eradication (1970-1979), there was an increase in malaria endemicity and a resurgence of the epidemic transmission. Due to financial problems affecting the regularity of the operations, Colombia was unable to sustain the results and achieve an interruption of transmission, which resulted in a resurgence of cases during the attack and consolidation phases. Conclusions: The campaign did not achieve the goal of interrupting malaria transmission in the national territory but there was marked control in areas of medium and low intensity.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication , Malaria , Mosquito Control , Epidemiology , Colombia , History
4.
J. bras. nefrol ; 44(1): 109-111, Jan-Mar. 2022. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1365022

ABSTRACT

Abstract Infection by the hepatitis C virus is more prevalent in patients on dialysis than in the general population in Brazil, and has been associated with worse outcomes. Current therapy for hepatitis C is highly effective, safe, and widely available in Brazil, with coverage provided to dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease, which makes the elimination of hepatitis C a viable target. The Brazilian Society of Nephrology, the Brazilian Society of Hepatology, and the Brazilian Liver Institute developed the "Brazilian Registry for the Elimination of Hepatitis C in Dialysis Units". This project aims to identify, treat, and monitor the response to treatment of patients on chronic dialysis infected with the hepatitis C virus in Brazil. This article presents the issue and invites Brazilian nephrologists to rally around the achievement of a significant goal.


Resumo A infecção pelo vírus da hepatite C é mais prevalente em pacientes em diálise do que na população geral no Brasil e implica um pior prognóstico. O tratamento atual para hepatite C é altamente eficaz, seguro e disponível no país, inclusive para a população de pacientes crônicos em diálise, o que torna a eliminação do vírus da hepatite C uma meta viável. A Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia, a Sociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia e o Instituto Brasileiro do Fígado desenvolveram o "Registro Brasileiro para Eliminação da Hepatite C nas Unidades de Diálise". O projeto visa identificar pacientes em diálise crônica com vírus da hepatite C no Brasil, além de tratar e monitorar a resposta virológica após o tratamento. Este breve artigo apresenta o problema e convida os nefrologistas brasileiros a unirem forças nesse objetivo comum.

5.
Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) ; 36(supl.2): e00145720, 2020.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1132880

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste artigo é rever o "estado da arte" dos avanços, obstáculos e estratégias para atingir a erradicação global da pólio. As ações de controle da poliomielite iniciaram na década de 1960 com o advento das duas vacinas antipoliomielíticas, a vacina oral da pólio (VOP) e a vacina inativada da pólio (VIP). No período de 1985 a 2020, são implementadas estratégias para atingir a meta de erradicação do poliovírus selvagem (WPV). Após o sucesso da interrupção da transmissão autóctone do WPV na região da Américas, foi lançada a meta da erradicação global. Descrevemos o processo de erradicação em quatro tempos: (1) O advento das vacinas VIP e VOP iniciou a era do controle da poliomielite; (2) A utilização massiva e simultânea da VOP teve impacto significativo sobre a transmissão do poliovírus selvagem no final da década de 1970 no Brasil; (3) Políticas públicas (nacionais e internacionais) decidem pela erradicação da transmissão autóctone do poliovírus selvagem nas Américas e definem as estratégias epidemiológicas para interromper a transmissão; e (4) A implantação das estratégias de erradicação interrompeu a transmissão autóctone do WPV em quase todas as regiões do mundo, exceto no Paquistão e Afeganistão, onde, em 2020, cadeias de transmissão do WPV1 desafiam as estratégias de contenção do vírus. Por outro lado, a persistência e a disseminação da circulação do poliovírus derivado da VOP, em países com baixa cobertura vacinal, somadas às dificuldades para substituir a VOP pela VIP constituem, atualmente, os obstáculos para a erradicação a curto prazo. Finalmente, discutimos as estratégias para superar os obstáculos e os desafios na era pós-erradicação.


El objetivo de este artículo es revisar el "estado de la cuestión" de los avances, obstáculos y estrategias para alcanzar la erradicación global de la polio. Las acciones de control de la poliomielitis se iniciaron en la década de 1960, con el advenimiento de las dos vacunas antipoliomielíticas, la vacuna oral de la polio (VOP) y la vacuna inactivada de la polio (VIP). En el período de 1985 a 2020, se implementan estrategias para alcanzar la meta de la erradicación del virus de la polio salvaje (WPV). Tras el éxito de la interrupción de la transmisión autóctona del WPV en la región de las Américas, se lanzó la meta de la erradicación global. Describimos el proceso de erradicación en cuatro tiempos: (1) El advenimiento de las vacunas VIP y VOP inició la era del control de la poliomielitis; (2) La utilización masiva y simultánea de la VOP tuvo un impacto significativo sobre la transmisión del virus de la polio salvaje, al final de la década de 1970, en Brasil; (3) Políticas públicas (nacionales e internacionales) deciden la erradicación de la transmisión autóctona del virus de la polio salvaje en las Américas y definen las estrategias epidemiológicas para interrumpir la transmisión; y (4) La implantación de las estrategias de erradicación interrumpió la transmisión autóctona del WPV en casi todas las regiones del mundo, excepto en Paquistán y Afganistán, donde, en 2020, cadenas de transmisión del WPV1 desafían las estrategias de contención del virus. Por otro lado, la persistencia y la diseminación de la circulación del virus de la polio, derivado de la VOP, en países con baja cobertura de vacunas, sumadas a las dificultades para substituir la VOP por la VIP constituyen, actualmente, los obstáculos para la erradicación a corto plazo. Finalmente, discutimos las estrategias para superar los obstáculos y los desafíos en la era poserradicación.


This article's objective is to review the "state of the art" in the progress, obstacles, and strategies for achieving global polio eradication. Poliomyelitis control measures began in the 1960s with the advent of two vaccines, the oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). From 1985 to 2020, strategies were implemented to reach the goal of eradication of wild poliovirus (WPV). Following the success with the interruption of indigenous WPV transmission in the Americas, the goal of global eradication was launched. We describe the process of eradication in four historical stages: (1) The advent of the inactivated and oral polio vaccines launched the age of poliomyelitis control; (2) The massive and simultaneous use of OPV had a significant impact on WPV transmission in the late 1970s in Brazil; (3) Domestic and international public policies set the goal of eradication of indigenous WPV transmission in the Americas and defined the epidemiological strategies to interrupt transmission; and (4) The implementation of eradication strategies interrupted indigenous WPV transmission in nearly all regions of the world except Pakistan and Afghanistan, where in 2020 the WPV1 transmission chains have challenged the strategies for containment of the virus. Meanwhile, the persistence and dissemination of circulation of OPV-derived poliovirus in countries with low vaccination coverage, plus the difficulties in replacing OPV with IPV, are currently the obstacles to eradication in the short term. Finally, we discuss the strategies for overcoming the obstacles and challenges in the post-eradication era.


Subject(s)
Humans , Poliomyelitis/prevention & control , Poliomyelitis/epidemiology , Immunization Programs , Brazil/epidemiology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral , Afghanistan , Disease Eradication
6.
Arch. méd. Camaguey ; 23(4): 540-558, jul.-ago. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1088794

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Fundamento: el paludismo como problema de salud pública mundial, afecta a un elevado número de personas cada año. Congruente con evaluaciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud y la Organización Panamericana de la Salud, cada año se presentan entre 50 y 100 millones de casos de la enfermedad. Objetivo: caracterizar el paludismo como enfermedad endémica en Ecuador. Métodos: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de un total de 23 artículos en las bases de datos Scopus, Latindex y SciELO, mediante un gestor de búsqueda y administrador de referencias Endnote, de ellos 22 corresponden a los últimos cuatro años, 12 corresponden a artículos en diferentes revistas electrónicas y sitios web especializados en el tema y 11 a informes y documentos de organizaciones mundiales, de los cuales se utilizaron 72 citas seleccionadas para la revisión. Resultados: los diferentes documentos relacionados con las estadísticas, destacan el incremento del paludismo en diferentes áreas del planeta, por lo cual se intencionan acciones que contribuyen a su disminución e incluso erradicación, sin embargo en Ecuador, en los últimos dos años los resultados son desfavorables en este sentido. Conclusiones: es evidente que los directivos de la salud pública y factores comunitarios de cada país afectado por paludismo, deben asumir un enfoque preventivo que vele por los problemas de salud de las comunidades y favorezca el medio ambiente, fomenten en iniciativas que promuevan mayor responsabilidad ambiental a favor de erradicarla. En el caso de Ecuador, se muestran resultados desfavorables que tienden al incremento de esta enfermedad.


ABSTRACT Background: the malaria as problem of world public health, affects a high number of persons every year. Coherent with evaluations of the World Health Organization and the Pan-American Health Organization, between 50 and 100 million cases of the illness are presented every year. Objective: to characterize the malaria as an endemic illness in Ecuador. Methods: a bibliographical review of a whole of 23 articles was carried out in the Scopus, Latindex and SciELO databases, by means of a search engine and Endnote references manager, of them 22 correspond to last four years, 12 correspond to articles in different electronic magazines and web sites specializing in the topic and 11 to reports and documents of world organizations, of which 72 quotations selected for the review were used. Results: the different documents related to the statistics, emphasize the increase of the malaria in different areas of the planet, for which actions that contribute to its decrease and even eradication are carried out, nevertheless in Ecuador, in the last two years the results are unfavorable in this sense. Conclusions: it is clear that the managers of the public health and community factors of every country affected by malaria, must assume a preventive approach that looks over the problems of health of the communities and favors the environment, they encourage in initiatives that promote major environmental responsibility in favor of eradicating it. In case of Ecuador, there appear unfavorable results that tend to the increase of this illness.

7.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology ; : 26-34, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-719438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Both bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy have been suggested as second-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 14-day moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy (14-EAM) in second-line H. pylori eradication in comparison to 7-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (7-RBMT). METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2015, a total of 569 patients who failed to respond to first-line triple therapy and who subsequently received second-line 7-RBMT or 14-EAM were retrospectively enrolled. The eradication rates were identified using per-protocol (PP) analysis. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by a 13C-urea breath test (UBiT-IR300®; Otsuka Electronics, Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) or a rapid urease test (CLOtest®; Delta West, Bentley, Australia) at least 4 weeks after completion of eradication therapy. RESULTS: A total of 487 and 82 patients received 7-RBMT and 14-EAM, respectively. PP eradication rates were 93.6% (366/391; 95% CI, 91.0–95.9%) with 7-RBMT and 73.8% (48/65; 95% CI, 63.1–84.6%) with14-EAM (p < 0.001). Therefore, the eradication rates with 7-RBMT were significantly higher than with 14-EAM according to the PP analysis. The adverse event rate was 17.1% (67/391) with 7-RBMT and 7.7% (5/65) with 14-EAM (p=0.065). In terms of risk factors, multivariate analysis revealed that 14-EAM (OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 2.74–10.93) was related to H. pylori eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: 7-RBMT may be an effective second-line therapy in patients who failed to respond to first-line triple therapy in Korea, where there is a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bismuth , Breath Tests , Disease Eradication , Helicobacter pylori , Helicobacter , Korea , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Urease
8.
Gut and Liver ; : 531-540, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-763873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This nationwide, multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10-day concomitant therapy (CT) and 10-day sequential therapy (ST) with 7-day clarithromycin-containing triple therapy (TT) as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in the Korean population. METHODS: Patients with H. pylori infection were assigned randomly to 7d-TT (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days), 10d-ST (lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for the remaining 5 days), or 10d-CT (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 10 days). The primary endpoint was eradication rate by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1,141 patients were included. The 10d-CT protocol achieved a markedly higher eradication rate than the 7d-TT protocol in both the ITT (81.2% vs 63.9%) and PP analyses (90.6% vs 71.4%). The eradication rate of the 10d-ST protocol was superior to that of the 7d-TT protocol (76.3% vs 63.9%, ITT analysis; 85.0% vs 71.4%, PP analysis). No significant differences in adherence or serious side effects were found among the three treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The 10d-CT and 10d-ST regimens were superior to the 7d-TT regimen as standard first-line treatment in Korea.


Subject(s)
Humans , Amoxicillin , Arm , Clarithromycin , Disease Eradication , Helicobacter pylori , Helicobacter , Korea , Lansoprazole , Metronidazole , Prospective Studies
9.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 22(3): 317-329, July-Sept. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-975585

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction A majority of otolaryngologists have not had direct experience with many vaccine-preventable diseases since the creation of national vaccination programs. Despite the elimination of endemic transmission of some of these diseases in the United States, outbreaks can occur anywhere and still pose a threat to public health around the world. Recent outbreaks and changing trends in exemption rates indicate that it is important for physicians to maintain a working knowledge of how these diseases present and of the recommended treatment guidelines. Objectives This review will evaluate the current state of vaccination rates, vaccine exemption rates and disease incidence in the United States and in the world. It will also examine the clinical presentation and treatment recommendations of these diseases. Data Synthesis United States estimated vaccination rates, vaccine exemption rates and vaccine-preventable disease incidences were obtained from data compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. World vaccination rates and disease incidences were obtained from the World Health Organization databases, which compile official figures reported by member states. A PubMed literature review provided information on the current state of vaccination exemptions and outbreaks in the United States. Conclusion Vaccination and vaccine exemption rates continue to put the United States and many areas of the world at risk for outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Clinical guidelines should be reviewed in the event of a local outbreak.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Otolaryngologists/education , Asia , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella/epidemiology , United States , Americas , Vaccines , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Africa , Diphtheria/prevention & control , Diphtheria/epidemiology , Europe , Disease Eradication/statistics & numerical data , Haemophilus Infections/prevention & control , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/epidemiology
10.
Rev. peru. med. exp. salud publica ; 35(2): 321-325, abr.-jun. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-961877

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Este artículo tiene como objetivo difundir conceptos relevantes en el diseño de intervenciones sanitarias. Teniendo en cuenta que la evidencia epidemiológica y la potencia del instrumental disponible o composición tecnológica de control son fundamentales para la determinación de una escala de objetivos en salud pública: extinción; erradicación; eliminación; control o reducción de niveles de exposición o control de la transmisión natural; reducción o prevención de ocurrencia de epidemias; limitación del daño y reducción de la mortalidad. El factor limitante para el logro de estos objetivos debe estar dado por la epidemiología de la enfermedad, que puede estar determinada por inaccesibilidad y/o patrones excepcionales de transmisión, dificultades operacionales e insuficiencia de medios, pero no por la inaplicación del conocimiento existente.


ABSTRACT This article aims to disseminate relevant concepts in the design of health interventions. Taking into account that the epidemiological evidence and the strength of the available instruments or technological control composition are fundamental for the determination of a scale of public health objectives: extinction, eradication, elimination, control or reduction of levels of exposure or control of natural transmission, reduction or prevention of the occurrence of epidemics, limitation of damage and reduction of mortality. The limiting factor for achieving these objectives must be given by the epidemiology of the disease, which may be determined by inaccessibility or exceptional patterns of transmission, operational difficulties, and insufficient means, but not by the inapplicability of existing knowledge.


Subject(s)
Humans , Public Health , Disease Eradication/organization & administration , Goals
11.
Univ. med ; 59(3)2018. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-994968

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la infección por Helicobacter pylori es un problema de salud pública, dada su relación con cáncer gástrico. El incremento de la resistencia bacteriana limita la erradicación efectiva, a pesar del empleo de diferentes esquemas de tratamiento. Métodos: revisión de la literatura en la base de datos Pubmed/Medline entre el 1 de enero de 2015 y el 31 de diciembre de 2016 sobre el manejo del Helicobacter pylori. Resultados: se incluyeron 26 artículos. La terapia secuencial sobresale como opción de tratamiento de primera línea para escenarios como Colombia. La implementación de coadyuvantes puede influir en las tasas de erradicación. Los estudios de epidemiología local y costo-efectividad son escasos. Conclusiones: el uso y conocimiento adecuado de los esquemas de manejo puede disminuir los costos para el sistema, la resistencia antimicrobiana y favorecer la erradicación de patógenos. Se requieren estudios para generar recomendaciones locales.


Introduction: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a public health problem due to its relationship with gastric cáncer The escalation of antibiotic resistance hampers an effective eradication, despite the availability of treatment options. Methods: A review of the literature was performed in the database PubMed between 01/01/2015 and 31/31/2016. Results: Twenty six articles were included. Sequential therapy stands out as a first line therapy for scenarios such as Colombia. The implementation of adjuvants may have a positive impact on eradication rates. Local epidemiólogo- and cost-effectiveness studies are scarce. The results were analized by erradication therapies, coadyuvant treatment, guidelines and outcomes non mentioned in the guidelines. Conclusions: The correct use and knowledge of the different treatment options could reduce the costs for the health systems, the antibiotics resistance and could favor pathogen eradication. Further studies are required for establishing local recommendations.


Subject(s)
Helicobacter pylori/classification , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Drug Therapy/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis
12.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 42: e42, 2018. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-961731

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivos Descrever o perfil epidemiológico da hanseníase no Brasil no período de 2005 a 2015 e verificar como os indicadores brasileiros estão se comportando em relação às metas estipuladas pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) para eliminação dessa doença. Métodos A pesquisa foi realizada a partir dos dados disponíveis nos sites do Ministério da Saúde. Foram avaliados os indicadores: dados de prevalência, coeficientes de detecção geral e conforme grupo etário (< 15 anos ou ≥ 15 anos), porcentagem de cura e grau 2 de incapacidade. Resultados No período do estudo, o coeficiente de prevalência dos casos de hanseníase manteve-se em patamar médio (de 1,00 a 4,99/10 000 habitantes), com tendência nacional decrescente. Entretanto, esse comportamento não foi observado nas regiões Nordeste, Norte e Centro-Oeste. O coeficiente de casos novos em indivíduos com menos de 15 anos apresentou diminuição entre 2005 e 2015 em todas as regiões. O coeficiente de detecção de casos novos diagnosticados com grau 2 de incapacidade teve redução significativa, principalmente nas regiões Sul e Sudeste; o Norte do país foi a única região com aumento desse coeficiente. O percentual de cura de hanseníase no Brasil, independentemente da faixa etária, não sofreu alteração desde 2005, sendo considerado regular (75% a 90%). Conclusão Os principais indicadores de hanseníase apresentaram redução no período do estudo. Embora o Brasil não tenha erradicado a hanseníase, essa meta deverá ser alcançada em 2020 caso sejam mantidos os parâmetros. Recomenda-se adaptar a política de atenção à hanseníase à realidade de cada região brasileira, visto que a prevalência da doença apresenta distribuição heterogênea.


ABSTRACT Objective To describe the epidemiological profile of leprosy in Brazil in the period from 2005 to 2015 and describe the behavior of leprosy indicators in relation to the goals established by the World Health Organization (WHO) for elimination of this disease. Method The study was performed using data from the Ministry of Health websites. The following indicators were assessed: prevalence, overall coefficient of detection, coefficient of detection according to age (< 15 years or ≥ 15 years), cure rate, and proportion of cases with WHO grade 2 disability. Results During the study period, the prevalence of leprosy cases was stable at a medium level (1.00 to 4.99/10 000 population), with decreasing national trend. However, the national trend was not observed in the Northeast, North, and Midwest regions. The coefficient of new cases in individuals < 15 years of age decreased from 2005 to 2015 in all regions. A marked decrease was detected in the proportion of new cases with grade 2 disability, especially in the South and Southeast. The North was the only region with increase in this indicator. The rate of leprosy cure in Brazil has not changed since 2005, having remained within the 75-90% range regardless of age group. Conclusion There was improvement (reduction) in the main leprosy indicators in Brazil from 2005 to 2015. Even though Brazil did not eradicate leprosy, this goal will likely be reached in 2020 if the current parameters are maintained. Leprosy control policies should be adapted to the reality of each Brazilian region, given the heterogeneous distribution of prevalence.


RESUMEN Objetivos Describir el perfil epidemiológico de la lepra en el Brasil en el período 2005-2015 y verificar cómo se comportan los indicadores brasileños en relación con las metas establecidas por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) para la eliminación de esa enfermedad. Métodos La investigación se realizó a partir de los datos disponibles en los sitios del Ministerio de Salud. Los indicadores evaluados fueron los datos de prevalencia, los coeficientes de detección general y por grupo etario (<15 o ≥ 15 años), el porcentaje de curación y la discapacidad de grado 2. Resultados En el período del estudio, el coeficiente de prevalencia de casos de lepra se mantuvo en un nivel promedio (de 1,00 a 4,99/10 000 habitantes), con una tendencia nacional decreciente. Sin embargo, en las regiones del nordeste, norte y centro-oeste no se observó ese comportamiento. El coeficiente de casos nuevos en menores de 15 años disminuyó entre el 2005 y el 2015 en todas las regiones. El coeficiente de detección de casos nuevos con diagnóstico de discapacidad de grado 2 tuvo una reducción significativa, principalmente en las regiones del sur y del sudeste; el norte del país fue la única región donde aumentó ese coeficiente. El porcentaje de curación de la lepra en el Brasil no ha cambiado desde el 2005 y se considera regular (de 75% a 90%), independientemente del grupo de edad. Conclusión Los principales indicadores de lepra se redujeron en el período del estudio. Aunque no se haya erradicado la lepra en el Brasil, esa meta deberá alcanzarse en el 2020 si se mantienen los parámetros. Se recomienda adaptar la política de atención a la lepra a la realidad de cada región brasileña, en vista de que la prevalencia de la enfermedad presenta una distribución heterogénea.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication , Disease Eradication/organization & administration , Leprosy/prevention & control , Leprosy/epidemiology , Brazil
13.
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research ; : 120-126, 2018.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-738961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori with standard triple therapy as a first-line treatment has decreased to 70~85%. Recently, concomitant therapy has been reported to overcome this decrease in eradication rate to some degree. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of 7-day concomitant therapy with that of 7-day standard triple therapy as a first-line treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2013 and February 2017, the medical records of 261 patients who received 7-day standard triple therapy or 7-day concomitant therapy as a first-line H. pylori eradication therapy were retrospectively evaluated. Successful eradication was confirmed using the 13C-urea breath test 6 to 8 weeks after the end of the eradication therapy. RESULTS: This study included 261 patients, 140 patients in the standard triple therapy group and 121 in the concomitant therapy group. The H. pylori eradication rate by intention-to-treat analysis was 60.0% in the standard triple therapy group and 81.0% in the concomitant therapy group (P<0.001). In the per-protocol analysis, the H. pylori eradication rates in the standard triple therapy and concomitant therapy groups were 69.4% and 88.3%, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant therapy was more effective as a first-line H. pylori eradication therapy than the standard triple therapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Breath Tests , Disease Eradication , Helicobacter pylori , Helicobacter , Medical Records , Retrospective Studies
14.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 34(4): 347-351, ago. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-899722

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción: La infección por Cystoisospora belli es una de las causas más frecuentes de diarrea acuosa en pacientes con infección por VIH y ocasiona altas tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en pacientes infectados con VIH y diarrea por C. belli. Características clínicas y de laboratorio fueron recolectadas mediante el análisis de historias clínicas. Resultados: Se identificaron siete casos. Cuatro presentaron diarrea recurrente a pesar de recibir profilaxis secundaria con cotrimoxazol y tratamiento específico, dos de los cuales tuvieron buena respuesta viral e inmunológica al tratamiento anti-retroviral de gran actividad (TARGA) al momento del diagnóstico y tratamiento antiparasitario. Mientras que, los tres restantes no recibían profilaxis, tampoco TARGA (dos de ellos), pero respondieron bien al tratamiento. Conclusiones: C. belli es causa importante de diarrea en pacientes VIH con TARGA y profilaxis, pudiendo tener distinta evolución clínica. Sugerimos que la infección persistente puede ser debido al fallo farmacológico por causas intrínsecas o extrínsecas al parásito, o a defectos en la restauración del sistema inmune intestinal, o ambos.


Introduction: Cystoisospora belli infection is one of the most important causes of watery diarrhea in patients with HIV and causes high rates of morbidity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with HIV and diarrhea by C. belli. Clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected by analyzing clinical records. Results: Four had recurrent diarrhea despite receiving secondary prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole and specific treatment, two of which had a good viral and immunological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) at the time of diagnosis and antiparasitic treatment. While the remaining three did not receive prophylaxis, neither did HAART (two of them), but they responded well to treatment. Conclusions: C. belli is an important cause of diarrhea in HIV patients on HAART and prophylaxis, being able to have different clinical evolution. We suggest that persistent infection may be due to drug failure by intrinsic or extrinsic to the parasite causes, or to defects in restoration of the intestinal immune system, or both.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Coccidiosis/microbiology , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/microbiology , Sarcocystidae/microbiology , Diarrhea/microbiology , Peru , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/complications , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Diarrhea/etiology
15.
Rev. gastroenterol. Perú ; 37(3): 225-230, jul.-sep. 2017. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-991257

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Objetivo: Determinar la efectividad de dos nuevos esquemas para el tratamiento de Helicobacter pylori frente al esquema triple convencional de amoxilina, claritromicina y un inhibidor de bomba de protones. Materiales y métodos: Estudio prospectivo, no aleatorio, realizado en una clínica privada de Lima, Perú. Los pacientes con infección por Helicobacter demostrada por endoscopia con biopsia y/o test de la ureasa, recibieron uno de tres tratamientos en estudio y fueron examinados mediante el test del aliento con urea C14, entre 1 y 6 meses después. Resultados: El tratamiento triple convencional solo logró la erradicación en 49/68 casos (71,2%) y el cuádruple con doxiciclina, metronidazol, bismuto y esomeprazol lo hizo en 52/62 casos (83,9%) siendo esta diferencia no significativa (p>0,1). El esquema simplificado de doxiciclina, furazolidona y bismuto logró curar a 79/83 pacientes (95,2%) superando a los dos anteriores con valor significativo (p<0,005 y p<0,05 respectivamente). Conclusiones: El tratamiento triple convencional para Helicobacter no está alcanzando niveles aceptables de efectividad en nuestra institución. Esto enfatiza la necesidad de buscar nuevas alternativas; por lo que sería útil validar con nuevos estudios los buenos resultados logrados por el régimen Simplificado de doxiciclina, furazolidona y bismuto que aquí presentamos


ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the effectiveness of two new therapeutic regimes for Helicobacter pylori versus triple therapy that includes a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin. Materials and methods: prospective study, non-randomized, in a private Hospital in Lima, Peru. Patients with biopsy and/or rapid ureasa test proven Helicobacter pylori infection received one of the three therapeutic regimens and were followed with a urea breath test 1 to 6 months upon completion of therapy. Results: Triple therapy achieved eradication in 49/68 of cases (71.2%); quadruple therapy (doxycycline + metronidazole + bismuth + esomeprazole) in 52/62 (83.9%), and the simplified regimen with doxycycline + furazolidone + bismuth, obtained success in 79/83 of cases (95.2%). Statistically significant difference with p<0.005 and p<0.05 respectively. Conclusion: Triple therapy against Hp does not achieve acceptable effectiveness in our institution. This highlights the need to look for new therapeutic options, being the simplified regime (doxycycline, furazolidone and bismuth) used in the current study a good option, requiring further studies for validation.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Helicobacter pylori , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antacids/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Peru , Bismuth/therapeutic use , Breath Tests , Prospective Studies , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Metronidazole/therapeutic use
16.
Rev. salud pública ; 19(1): 45-51, ene.-feb. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-903069

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective Identify and characterize indicators to assess progress in terms of control and monitoring of malaria in endemic areas of Colombia and compare malaria elimination findings with those of countries in the same region. Methods Cross-sectional surveys were carried out in 2011 and 2014 in malaria endemic areas in Colombia, Pacific and Caribbean regions. A socio-demographic and a clinical questionnaire were applied to each participant; likewise, written and informed consents were obtained. Capillary blood samples were taken and examined through microscopic tests and rapid diagnostic test. A narrative systematic review was conducted to correlate malaria elimination in Colombia and in countries of the Amazon Region. Results The sample consisted of 548 participants from the departments of Córdoba and Nariño, Colombia. The proportion of positive malaria cases was 3 % (17/548), in which the prevalence of malaria mixed infections was 47 % (8/17). Regarding fever, temperature over 38.0o C, its prevalence was 2.7 % (15/548). Only two febrile patients tested positive for the disease. Prevalence of asymptomatic malaria cases among all positive cases was 88 %. Conclusion Asymptomatic malaria cases, mixed infections and self-medication are the challenges that malaria control and elimination programs face. It is important to note that studies on subclinical malaria in the region are scarce. Endemic areas with dense populations and experiencing an increase in immigration levels are more vulnerable to malaria reemergence. Imported malaria cases impact the basic reproduction rate (Ro). Funding resources availability has impact on the sustainability of public health actions and the elimination of malaria in South America.(AU)


RESUMEN Objetivo Identificar y caracterizar indicadores de evaluación del progreso en el control de la malaria en regiones endémicas de Colombia y contrastar los hallazgos de eliminación con países de la misma región. Métodos Se realizaron cortes transversal en 2011 y 2014, en regiones endémicas para malaria de la Costa Pacífica y del Caribe de Colombia. Se obtuvo consentimiento informado y se aplicó una encuesta socio-demográfica y clínica a cada voluntario. La punción capilar se utilizó para examen microscópico y pruebas de diagnóstico rápido. La revisión narrativa y sistemática permitió comparar el estado de eliminación de malaria en Colombia y los países de la Amazonía. Resultados Un total de 548 voluntarios fueron estudiados en Córdoba y Nariño. La proporción de casos positivos de malaria fue 3 % (17/548). Las infecciones mixtas de malaria se presentaron en un 47 % (8/17). La prevalencia de fiebre, temperatura mayor o igual a 38oC, fue 2.7 % (15/548). Dos pacientes febriles fueron positivos para malaria. La prevalencia de casos asintomáticos se presentó en 88 %. Conclusión Los casos de malaria asintomática, infecciones mixtas y la automedicación constituyen un reto para los programas de control y eliminación. Estudios sobre malaria subclínica y eliminación son limitados en la región. Regiones endémicas con alta densidad poblacional y aumento en los niveles de migración incrementan la vulnerabilidad. Los casos importados afectan la reducción de la tasa reproductiva básica (Ro) por debajo de 1. El recurso financiero insuficiente afecta la sostenibilidad de las acciones de salud pública y la eliminación de malaria en las Américas.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Disease Eradication/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Malaria/epidemiology , South America/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies
17.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 41: e157, 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-961657

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective To propose and test a model for analyzing municipalities' level of risk of reintroduction and transmission of the measles virus in the post-elimination period in the Americas. Methods An ecological-analytical study was conducted using data on the measles epidemic that occurred in 2013-2015 in northeastern Brazil. The variables for analysis were selected after an extensive review of scientific literature on the risk of importation of measles cases. A univariate analysis considering the presence or absence of confirmed cases of measles in 184 municipalities in the state of Ceará, Brazil, was carried out to evaluate the association between the dependent variable and 23 independent variables, grouped into four categories: 1) characteristics of the municipalities; 2) quality indicators for immunization programs and epidemiological surveillance; 3) organizational structure for the public health response; and 4) selected impact indicators. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. All variables with P < 0.200 were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Based on the results, the municipalities were categorized by four levels of risk ("low," "medium," "high," and "very high"). Results The model sensitivity was 95% for concordance between municipalities classified as "high risk" and "very high risk" and those that had an epidemic between 2013 and 2015 in Ceará. Of the 38 municipalities that had an epidemic, 76% (29/38) were classified as "high risk" and "very high risk"; 146 municipalities did not report cases (P < 0.0002). Conclusions Given the imminent risk of reintroduction of measles circulation in the post-elimination period in the Americas, this model may be useful in identifying areas at greater risk for reintroduction and continued transmission of measles. Knowledge of vulnerable areas could trigger appropriate surveillance and monitoring to prevent sustained transmission.


RESUMEN Objetivo Proponer y poner a prueba un modelo para analizar el nivel de riesgo de reintroducción y transmisión del virus del sarampión que existe en los municipios durante el período posterior a la eliminación en la Región de las Américas. Métodos Se realizó un estudio ecológico y analítico empleando datos sobre la epidemia de sarampión que afectó al noreste del Brasil del 2013 al 2015. Las variables para el análisis se seleccionaron después de efectuar un amplio examen de las publicaciones científicas sobre el riesgo de importación de casos de sarampión. Se llevó a cabo un análisis con una sola variable considerando la presencia o ausencia de los casos de sarampión confirmados en 184 municipios del estado de Ceará (Brasil) para evaluar la asociación entre la variable dependiente y 23 variables independientes, que se agruparon en cuatro categorías: 1) características de los municipios; 2) indicadores de calidad de los programas de vacunación y la vigilancia epidemiológica; 3) estructura de organización de la respuesta de salud pública, y 4) indicadores del impacto seleccionados. Se consideró significativo un valor de P < 0,05. Todas las variables con un valor P < 0,200 se analizaron empleando una regresión logística con varias variables. Teniendo en cuenta los resultados, los municipios se clasificaron en función de cuatro niveles de riesgo ("bajo", "medio", "alto" y "muy alto"). Resultados El modelo tenía una sensibilidad de 95% en el caso de la concordancia entre los municipios clasificados dentro de las categorías de "riesgo alto" y "riesgo muy alto" y los que tuvieron una epidemia entre el 2013 y el 2015 en Ceará. De los 38 municipios que tuvieron una epidemia, 76% (29/38) se clasificaron dentro de las categorías de "riesgo alto" y "riesgo muy alto"; 146 municipios no notificaron casos (P < 0,0002). Conclusiones Dado el riesgo inminente de reintroducción de la circulación del sarampión durante el período posterior a la eliminación en la Región de las Américas, este modelo puede ser útil para reconocer las zonas en las que existe un mayor riesgo de reintroducción y transmisión continua del sarampión. El conocimiento de las zonas vulnerables podría desembocar en actividades de vigilancia y seguimiento apropiadas para evitar la transmisión sostenida.


RESUMO Objetivo Elaborar e testar um modelo para analisar o risco de reintrodução e transmissão do vírus do sarampo ao nível municipal no período pós-eliminação nas Américas. Métodos Um estudo analítico-ecológico foi realizado com base nos dados da epidemia de sarampo ocorrida em 2013-2015 no nordeste do Brasil. As variáveis para análise foram selecionadas após extensa revisão da literatura científica sobre o risco de importação de casos de sarampo. Uma análise univariada considerando a presença ou a ausência de casos confirmados de sarampo em 184 municípios no Estado do Ceará foi conduzida para avaliar a associação entre a variável dependente e 23 variáveis independentes divididas em quatro grupos: 1) características dos municípios, 2) indicadores de qualidade dos programas de vacinação e da vigilância epidemiológica, 3) estrutura organizacional para resposta em saúde pública e 4) indicadores de impacto selecionados. Um nível de significância de 5% foi definido. Todas as variáveis com P < 0,200 foram analisadas por regressão logística multivariada e, segundo os resultados, os municípios foram categorizados em quatro níveis de risco: baixo, intermediário, alto e muito alto. Resultados A sensibilidade do modelo foi de 95% para concordância entre os municípios categorizados como "risco alto" e "risco muito alto" e os que registraram a ocorrência de epidemia entre 2013 e 2015 no Ceará. Dos 38 municípios onde ocorreu uma epidemia, 76% (29/38) apresentaram "risco alto" e "risco muito alto" de reintrodução e transmissão do vírus do sarampo e 146 municípios não notificaram casos (P < 0,0002). Conclusão Diante do risco iminente de reintrodução da circulação do vírus do sarampo no período pós-eliminação nas Américas, este modelo pode servir para identificar as áreas de maior risco de reintrodução e transmissão contínua do vírus do sarampo. Conhecer as áreas vulneráveis incentiva a adoção de procedimentos adequados de vigilância e monitoramento a fim de prevenir a transmissão sustentada.


Subject(s)
Disease Eradication , Health Services Research , Brazil , Risk Assessment
18.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 41: e127, 2017. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-961674

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The year 2017 marks the 40th year of the establishment of the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), the regional office of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Americas, the first WHO region certified as eliminating poliomyelitis (1994), measles (2016), and rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) (2015). The English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean subregion of the Americas paved the way in eliminating these diseases. This report highlights the innovative strategies used in this subregion that helped make the EPI a success. A review of published/unpublished reports and written and oral accounts of the experiences of Immunization Advisors and national EPI managers was conducted to identify the strategies used to strengthen the Immunization program in the subregion since its implementation by countries in 1977. The results show that these include strong collective political commitment, country-specific immunization legislation, joint use of a standard coverage monitoring chart, annual meetings of national EPI managers, collaborative development of annual national Plans of Action for Immunization, coordinated implementation of vaccination campaigns, subregional oversight of surveillance and laboratory support, a performance award system for countries, and subregional standardized templates for immunization manuals and procedural guidelines. Political will and support for immunization has been particularly strong in this subregion, where 99% of EPI costs are borne by governments. Dedicated health staff and multi-country agreement and application of strategies have led to high sustained coverage and good-quality surveillance, resulting in the absence of wild polio for 34 years, measles for 25 years, CRS for 17 years, and rubella for 15 years.


RESUMEN En el 2017 se celebra el cuadragésimo año de la instauración del Programa Ampliado de Inmunización (PAI) por la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS), la Oficina Regional de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) para las Américas. Esta fue la primera región de la OMS que obtuvo la certificación de la eliminación de la poliomielitis (1994), el sarampión (2016) y la rubéola y el síndrome de rubéola congénita (2015). La subregión de habla inglesa y holandesa del Caribe en las Américas abrió el camino a la eliminación de estas enfermedades. En el presente artículo se destacan las estrategias innovadoras utilizadas en esta subregión que contribuyeron al éxito del PAI. Se llevó a cabo una revisión de los informes publicados e inéditos y de los relatos escritos y orales de las experiencias de los Expertos en Inmunización y los gerentes nacionales del PAI con el objeto de determinar las estrategias utilizadas con miras a fortalecer el programa de vacunación en la subregión, desde su introducción en los países en 1977. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto que los programas comportaban un fuerte compromiso político colectivo, legislaciones en materia de inmunización propias de cada país, la utilización común de un registro gráfico normalizado de monitoreo de coberturas de vacunación, reuniones anuales de los gerentes nacionales del PAI, la elaboración conjunta de planes de acción anuales nacionales sobre vacunas, la ejecución coordinada de campañas de vacunación, la supervisión de la vigilancia y el apoyo a los laboratorios a escala subregional, un sistema de reconocimiento al desempeño de los países y plantillas subregionales normalizadas de los manuales de vacunación y los procedimientos recomendados. La voluntad política y el apoyo a la vacunación han sido muy sólidos en esta subregión, donde los gobiernos sufragan 99% de los costos del PAI. La existencia de personal sanitario dedicado y los acuerdos multinacionales y la aplicación de las estrategias permitieron alcanzar una alta cobertura de manera sostenida y una vigilancia de buena calidad, cuyo resultado fue la ausencia de poliomielitis salvaje durante 34 años, de sarampión durante 25 años, del síndrome de la rubéola congénita durante 17 años y de la rubéola durante 15 años.


RESUMO O ano de 2017 marca o 40° aniversário da criação do Programa Ampliado de Imunização (PAI) pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS), Escritório Regional da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) nas Américas, primeira Região da OMS certificada como tendo eliminado a poliomielite (1994), o sarampo (2016) e a rubéola e síndrome da rubéola congênita (2015). A sub-região das Américas constituída pelos países do Caribe de língua inglesa e holandesa abriu caminho ao eliminar essas doenças. Este relato destaca as estratégias inovadoras usadas nesta sub-região que contribuíram para tornar o PAI um programa bem-sucedido. Foi realizada uma análise de informes publicados/inéditos e relatos orais e escritos da experiência dos assessores para assuntos de imunização e coordenadores nacionais do PAI visando identificar as estratégias aplicadas para consolidar o programa nos países da sub-região desde a sua implementação em 1977. Os resultados demonstram firme compromisso político coletivo, legislação de vacinação própria em cada país, uso conjunto de uma lista padrão para o monitoramento da cobertura, reuniões anuais dos coordenadores nacionais do PAI, desenvolvimento colaborativo de planos de ação nacionais anuais para vacinação, campanhas coordenadas de vacinação, supervisão sub-regional da vigilância e infraestrutura laboratorial, sistema de premiação dos países por bom desempenho, modelos padronizados para os manuais de vacinação e protocolos de procedimentos. A sub-região se caracteriza sobretudo pela vontade e apoio políticos para vacinação, sendo 99% do custo do PAI financiados pelos governos. Equipes de saúde diligentes, acordos entre vários países e emprego de estratégias são fatores que contribuem para elevada cobertura sustentada e vigilância de boa qualidade com a consequente não ocorrência de casos de poliomielite por vírus selvagem por 34 anos, de casos de sarampo por 25 anos, de casos de síndrome da rubéola congênita por 17 anos e de casos de rubéola por 15 anos.


Subject(s)
Mass Vaccination , Disease Eradication/statistics & numerical data , Caribbean Region/epidemiology
19.
Innovation ; : 28-36, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-686900

ABSTRACT

@#BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori), the main cause of gastric and duodenal ulcer, is considered as a type 1 carcinogen. The primary prevention of gastric cancer is eradicating chronic H.pylori infection. However, the antimicrobial eradication rates are decreasing as low as 80% in some countries, less than 70% in Europe and are inversely correlated with antibiotic resistance rates reported worldwide. The current international guidelines recommended several regimens with higher success rate including sequential, combined, bismuth-containing and resistance-guided treatment and states that the local susceptibility testing in H.pylori should be studied. The research data that is covering correlation between H.pylori associated gastric changes and precancerous diseases, evaluation of H.pylori eradication rate are sparse in Mongolia. METHODS Totally, 495 eligible candidates were enrolled into this study. 225 patients who visited to endoscopy unit, received gastroscopy with multiple biopsies for rapid urease test, histology and H.pylori culturing. Out of these, 131 (52.2%) patients were positive for H.pylori infection. These were further tested for antibiotic resistance. 76 patients were treated with targeted therapy based on antibiotic resistance testing. Another 270 eligible patients with confirmed H.pylori associated gastritis were randomized into the following 1st line therapy regimen groups clarithromycin-based triple therapy (CBTT, n=90); bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BBQT, n=90) and sequential therapy (ST, n=90). In 43 patients that were not responded to 1st line therapy, levofloxacin-based triple therapy (LBTT) was prescribed as a second line treatment. Eradication rates were assessed using H.pylori stool antigen test 28 days of therapy just subsequent to termination of treatment. RESULTS During the gastroscopy, presence of active gastritis, nodular change and atrophy were 32.9%, 12% and 52.9% respectively. Epigastric pain was reported in 73.3%, 62.2%, 60-80% and 41.3% of patients with normal mucosa, nodular change, stomach and duodenal ulcer and antral atrophy (p<0.05). Abdominal fullness was more common among patients with extensive gastric atrophy (69.2%, p<0.05). In <40 age group gastritis was predominantly in the prepylori, while in the >50 age group it was predominantly the corpus region. H.pylori resistance rates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and more than 2 antibiotics were 8.4%, 37.4%, 74% and 30.5%. On ITT analysis, eradication rates of 1st line H.pylori targeted treatment, CBTT, BBQT and ST were 92.1%, 71.1%, 87.8% and 67.8% (p<0.0001); on PP analysis, that were 94.6%, 72.7%, 89.8% and 68.5% (p<0.0001) respectively. Eradication rates of 2nd line treatment LBTT were 55.8% and 60% by ITT and PP analysis. Higher side-effects were reported during the second line treatment. CONCLUSION H.pylori infection rate was high among the dyspeptic patients resulting chronic gastritis and atrophic change. H.pylori resistance rate to metronidazole and clarithromycin was high. Among 1st line therapies; the eradication rates of CBTT and ST were poor, while BBQT and Targeted therapy had a higher success rate. 2nd line therapy showed higher failure rate.

20.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology ; : 232-238, 2017.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-51510

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been decreasing recently in Korea due to antibiotics resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the trend of eradication rate and clinical factors affecting the eradication rate of H. pylori in the last 10 years in west Gyeonggi-do, Korea. METHODS: The trends of eradication rate of H. pylori, gender, age, concomitant mediations, and clinical factors were retrospectively evaluated in patients with H. pylori infection between 2006 and 2015 (n=2,485). RESULTS: The overall H. pylori eradication rate for the standard triple therapy was 82.5%. The annual eradication rates from 2006 to 2015 were 90%, 77.9%, 75.8%, 83.2%, 85.6%, 90.1%, 81.3%, 81.1%, 78.7%, and 78.8%, respectively, showing a significant decrement during the last five years (p < 0.001). Higher eradication rate was observed in males than in females (p < 0.001). Esomeprazole showed a higher eradication rate compared with pantoprazole between 2006 and 2010 (p < 0.022). Age and the use of probiotics and mucosal protective agents played no significant role in the H. pylori eradication rate. The overall eradication rate for bismuth-based quadruple therapy was 94.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate of H. pylori over the last 10 years for first-line therapy ranged from 75.8 to 90.1%; the eradication rate for triple therapy has declined. However, the eradication rate for quadruple therapy has remained unchanged over the last 10 years.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Disease Eradication , Esomeprazole , Helicobacter pylori , Helicobacter , Korea , Probiotics , Protective Agents , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL